Volume IV: Society, Culture, and Local Ecological Wisdom

Dari Arsip Kertas Menuju Memori Digital: Rekonseptualisasi Arsip Digital melalui Ekoteologi Melayu-Islam untuk Memperkuat Ketahanan Budaya di Era Multipolar

  • Nirwati Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Supiana UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

Keywords

Memori Digital; Arsip Digital; Ekoteologi Melayu-Islam; Ketahanan Budaya; Memori Peradaban; Knowledge Stewardship; EDARF.

Abstract

Transisi dari arsip berbasis kertas menuju memori digital merupakan salah satu transformasi peradaban paling mendasar pada abad ke-21 yang mengubah cara masyarakat melestarikan pengetahuan, membangun identitas kolektif, dan menjaga keberlanjutan budaya antargenerasi. Meskipun transformasi arsip digital telah mempercepat modernisasi administrasi serta memperluas akses publik terhadap informasi, sebagian besar penelitian masih berfokus pada inovasi teknologi, pengelolaan arsip elektronik, dan tata kelola digital, sementara perhatian terhadap landasan etika dan budaya yang diperlukan untuk menjaga memori digital sebagai aset peradaban masih relatif terbatas. Kesenjangan konseptual ini menjadi semakin penting dalam konteks dunia Melayu yang mewarisi nilai-nilai amanah, khalifah, mizan, dan maslahah sebagai tradisi etis dalam menjaga pengetahuan, alam, dan tanggung jawab antargenerasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan merekonseptualisasi arsip digital sebagai infrastruktur memori peradaban melalui pengembangan kerangka ekoteologi yang mengintegrasikan nilai-nilai Melayu-Islam dengan tata kelola arsip digital untuk memperkuat ketahanan budaya pada era multipolar. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan qualitative archival research melalui analisis dokumen terhadap berbagai sumber primer yang diterbitkan oleh Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia (ANRI), meliputi peraturan perundang-undangan kearsipan, kebijakan strategis, dokumen implementasi Sistem Informasi Kearsipan Dinamis Terintegrasi (SRIKANDI), pedoman preservasi arsip, serta dokumen pelestarian warisan dokumenter nasional. Analisis diperkuat melalui telaah literatur mutakhir mengenai arsip digital, preservasi digital, keberlanjutan, ketahanan budaya, ekoteologi, dan kajian memori (memory studies). Data dianalisis menggunakan thematic content analysis dan sintesis konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa transformasi arsip digital di Indonesia tidak hanya merupakan modernisasi teknologi, tetapi juga mencerminkan proses peradaban dalam menjaga memori kolektif dan keberlanjutan budaya. Implementasi SRIKANDI, bersama dengan pelestarian arsip tekstual, foto, kartografi, audiovisual, dan arsip digital asli (born-digital archives), menunjukkan bahwa tata kelola arsip digital mampu meningkatkan akuntabilitas administrasi, mendukung tata kelola pemerintahan yang lebih ramah lingkungan, menjamin keberlanjutan pelestarian pengetahuan, serta melindungi warisan dokumenter nasional. Berdasarkan temuan tersebut, penelitian ini mengusulkan Eco-Theological Digital Archival Resilience Framework (EDARF) sebagai kerangka normatif-konseptual yang mengintegrasikan etika ekoteologi Melayu-Islam, knowledge stewardship, tata kelola arsip digital, keberlanjutan, dan ketahanan budaya. EDARF merekonseptualisasi arsip digital tidak hanya sebagai sistem informasi, tetapi sebagai infrastruktur memori peradaban yang menjaga nilai-nilai etis, identitas kolektif, dan kesinambungan budaya lintas generasi. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa keberlanjutan memori digital tidak hanya ditentukan oleh kemampuan teknologi, tetapi juga oleh pengelolaan yang berlandaskan nilai-nilai ekoteologi Melayu-Islam, sehingga menawarkan perspektif teoretis baru bagi pengembangan tata kelola arsip digital dalam masyarakat multipolar kontemporer.

References

  1. Ariawan, A., Soemartono, T., Effendy, K., & Sukmana, P. (2025). Digital Transformation In Parliamentary Institutions: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis Of Srikandi Implementation And Its Impact On Information Management Effectiveness. Media Mahardhika. https://doi.org/10.29062/mahardika.v24i1.1420
  2. Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia. (2011). Peraturan Kepala Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2011 tentang Pedoman Preservasi Arsip Statis. Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
  3. Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia. (2022). Pedoman implementasi Sistem Informasi Kearsipan Dinamis Terintegrasi (SRIKANDI). Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
  4. Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia. (2024). Laporan implementasi Sistem Informasi Kearsipan Dinamis Terintegrasi (SRIKANDI). Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
  5. Assmann, J. (2011). Cultural memory and early civilization: Writing, remembrance, and political imagination. Cambridge University Press.
  6. Bearman, D. (1994). Electronic evidence: Strategies for managing records in contemporary organizations. Archives and Museum Informatics.
  7. Bountouri, L. (2017). Archives in the digital age. Chandos Publishing.
  8. Cele, S., Stewart, M., & Asiedu, R. (2024). Digital Archival Preservation and Cultural Heritage. Journal of the Digital Humanities Association of Southern Africa (DHASA). https://doi.org/10.55492/dhasa.v5i1.5017
  9. Cook, T. (2013). Evidence, memory, identity, and community: Four shifting archival paradigms. Archival Science, 13(2–3), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7
  10. Duranti, L. (2010). Concepts and principles for the management of electronic records, or records management theory is archival diplomatics. Records Management Journal, 20(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011039852
  11. Edmondson, R. (2002). Memory of the world: General guidelines to safeguard documentary heritage. UNESCO. (UNESCO)
  12. Faizah, N. A., Thohir, M., Salem, S., & M. (2025). Optimizing Digital Archive Management to Improve the Quality of Integrated Public Services. Kharisma: Jurnal Administrasi dan Manajemen Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.59373/kharisma.v4i1.64
  13. Febrianingsih, D., Arifi, A., & Sabarudin, S. (2025). Ecotheology as a New Direction in the Politics and Policy of Islamic Religious Education in Indonesia. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v17i2.7426
  14. Folke, C. (2016). Resilience. Ecology and Society, 21(4), 44.
  15. Gilliland, A. J. (2014). Conceptualizing twenty-first-century archives. Society of American Archivists.
  16. Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory. University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1950).
  17. Hamdan, H. (2026). Islamic Education with an Ecological Perspective: Quranic Foundations, Environmental Ethics, and Pathways toward Sustainable Development. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. https://doi.org/10.38073/jpi.4545
  18. International Council on Archives. (2016). Principles and functional requirements for records in electronic office environments. International Council on Archives.
  19. International Organization for Standardization. (2016). ISO 15489-1:2016 Information and documentation—Records management—Part 1: Concepts and principles. ISO.
  20. Ketelaar, E. (2001). Tacit narratives: The meanings of archives. Archival Science, 1(2), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435644
  21. Ketelaar, E. (2005). Sharing: Collected memories in communities of records. Archives and Manuscripts, 33(1), 44–61.
  22. Kurniadi, K., Ibrahim, S., & Badruzzaman, B. (2025). Evaluation of the efficiency of electronic filing systems in handling records: a case study of SRIKANDI applications in government institutions. Cogent Education, 12. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2025.2562347
  23. Maficasari, Y. (2026). Analysis of the Implementation of the Integrated Dynamic Archival Information System (SRIKANDI) Application in Local Government Agencies within South Barito Regency. Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management. https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v5i8.1409
  24. Melnyk, R., Volkova, G., Hvozdetska, M., Bashmanivskyi, O., & Perederii, I. (2025). Digital Transformation of Cultural Heritage: Prospects and Threats. International Journal on Culture, History, and Religion. https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7isi1.381
  25. Millar, L. (2017). Archives: Principles and practices (2nd ed.). Facet Publishing.
  26. Mustofa, M. L., Zenrif, M. F., & Barizi, A. (2025). Towards an Islamic Ecotheology: Indonesian Muslim Organizations in Climate Mitigation and Adaptation Efforts. Problemy Ekorozwoju. https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.7089
  27. N., Rahman, D. A., Mardhiah, A., Fazril, M., Bakar, M. B. A., & Fakhrurrazi, F. (2025). The Effectiveness of Implementing the Integrated Dynamic Archival Information System (SRIKANDI) at the Ministry of Religion Office of Lhokseumawe City. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i4.18051
  28. Nababan, S., Samin, R., & Okparizan, O. (2026). SRIKANDI Digital Archiving Implementation. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse.v6i1.1923
  29. Nasr, S. H. (1996). Religion and the order of nature. Oxford University Press.
  30. Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: Les lieux de mémoire. Representations, 26, 7–24.
  31. Pearce-Moses, R. (2005). A glossary of archival and records terminology. Society of American Archivists.
  32. Priyatmo, R., & Satria, O. H. (2022). Electronic Records, Record Management System, System Usability Scale, SRIKANDI.. Jurnal Kearsipan. https://doi.org/10.46836/jk.v17i1.192
  33. Putri, D., Subagja, R., Wulandari, S., & Nurfalah, F. (2025). Srikandi Application: Digital Innovation for Dynamic Archive Management. Jurnal Polisci. https://doi.org/10.62885/polisci.v2i5.840
  34. Ramudin, R. P., Ramli, A. M., & Rosmana, H. (2024). Kepastian Hukum Penerapan Aplikasi Sistem Informasi Kearsipan Dinamis Terintegrasi (SRIKANDI). Khazanah: Jurnal Pengembangan Kearsipan. https://doi.org/10.22146/khazanah.93331
  35. Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2009 tentang Kearsipan. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.
  36. Republik Indonesia. (2012). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2012 tentang Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 43 Tahun 2009 tentang Kearsipan. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.
  37. Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory, history, forgetting. University of Chicago Press.
  38. Robertus, I., & Rasmita, R. (2025). Preserving the Cultural Heritage of Indonesian Society through Digital Preservation in Libraries. Knowledge Garden. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.knowledgegarden.2025.3.1.32
  39. Said, T. S., Ramli, H., & Natasha, A. D. (2023). The Adaptation of Malay Philosophy Values through Maritime education Preservation and Conservation Wisdom. BIO Web of Conferences. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20237906001
  40. Schwartz, J. M., & Cook, T. (2002). Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science, 2(1–2), 1–19.
  41. Suprayitno, S., Rahmi, R., & Sofiyani, Z. (2024). Imagining the Future of Records Management: An Analysis of the SRIKANDI in Indonesia through Documentation Studies. Proceedings from the Document Academy. https://doi.org/10.35492/docam/11/2/8
  42. Syahputra, W., Abdullah, D., Nurdin, N., Daud, M., & Taufiq, T. (2026). Analysis of the Efficiency and Performance Effectiveness of Srikandi Application Using the UTAUT Model and Delone & Mclean. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology.https://doi.org/10.52088/ijesty.v6i1.1806
  43. Teku, M., Gobang, J., Retu, M., & Sedu, V. (2024). Digital Transformation of Archives through the SRIKANDI Application. IJESS International Journal of Education and Social Science. https://doi.org/10.56371/ijess.v5i2.334
  44. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. (2023). World Heritage and Sustainable Development. UNESCO. https://whc.unesco.org/en/sustainabledevelopment/
  45. UNESCO. (2003). Charter on the preservation of digital heritage. UNESCO. (UNESCO)
  46. UNESCO. (2012). The Memory of the World in the digital age: Digitization and preservation. UNESCO. (UNESCO)
  47. UNESCO. (2015). Recommendation concerning the preservation of, and access to, documentary heritage including in digital form. UNESCO
  48. UNESCO. (2015). Recommendation concerning the preservation of, and access to, documentary heritage including in digital form. UNESCO.
  49. UNESCO. (2020). Thematic indicators for culture in the 2030 Agenda (Culture|2030 Indicators). UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000371562
  50. UNESCO. (2024). Memory of the World: Relevant documents. UNESCO. (UNESCO)
  51. UNESCO. (2025). Memory of the World Programme. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/memory-world/about
  52. Upward, F. (1996). Structuring the records continuum—Part one: Postcustodial principles and properties. Archives and Manuscripts, 24(2), 268–285.
  53. Yeo, G. (2007). Concepts of record (1): Evidence, information, and persistent representations. American Archivist, 70(2), 315–343.
  54. Yeo, G. (2018). Record-making and record-keeping in early societies. Routledge.
Scroll to Top