Volume I: Eco-Theology, Spirituality, and Environmental Ethics

Dakwah Struktural Berbasis Tauhid-Sibernetika untuk Kerukunan Dan Ekoteologi di Bandung Raya

  • Efendi Rahmat UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Sarbini UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • M. Yusuf Wibisono UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • Asep Shodiqin Maulana UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

Keywords

Dakwah Struktural, Sibernetika Tauhidik, Ekoteologi Islam, Penyuluh Agama Islam, Kerukunan Antarumat Beragama, Bandung Raya, DSIT

Abstract

Kawasan Bandung Raya menghadapi dua krisis yang saling berkaitan: melemahnya kerukunan antarumat beragama dan degradasi ekologis yang kian akut, keduanya berakar pada lemahnya internalisasi tauhid sebagai fondasi etika sosial dan lingkungan. Penyuluh Agama Islam (PAI) sebagai aparatur negara sekaligus agen dakwah formal memiliki posisi strategis untuk menjawab kedua tantangan tersebut, namun implementasi dakwah strukturalnya terbukti masih berjalan dalam logika birokrasi linear tanpa mekanisme umpan balik yang memadai.: Artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis relevansi sibernetika ekologi sosial dalam memperkuat konseptualisasi dakwah struktural PAI, menunjukkan tafsir ekoteologis berbasis tauhid sebagai fondasi teologis yang kokoh, serta merumuskan model integrasi keduanya dalam model Dakwah Struktural Integratif-Transformatif (DSIT). Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode fenomenologi dan studi kasus instrumental. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam terhadap 14 PAI, 3 Kepala KUA, dan 3 pejabat Bimas Islam di Bandung Raya pada Januari–Juni 2025, dianalisis menggunakan model Miles, Huberman, dan Saldaña dengan kerangka teoretis Weber, Blumer, Wiener, dan Bateson. Temuan menunjukkan defisit sibernetik dalam sistem evaluasi PAI, dominasi ekoteologi pada level khalīfah dan ihsān tanpa fondasi kosmologis tauhid bi'ī dan mīzān, serta absennya program eco-based interfaith yang terstruktur. Model DSIT dirumuskan dengan empat komponen: fondasi tauhidik-sibernetik, sistem adaptif, metodologi multimodal-dialogis, dan mekanisme umpan balik ekoteologis, yang membutuhkan tiga literasi baru bagi PAI: literasi sibernetik, ekoteologis, dan lintas agama.

References

  1. Abdallah, Y., & Osman, M. (2023). Transforming the Role of Islamic Religious Counselors in Southeast Asia. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 43(1), 79–98.
  2. Abdel Haleem, M. A. (2021). The Qur'an and Environmental Ethics. Edinburgh University Press.
  3. Abdillah, M. (2001). Agama dan Lingkungan Hidup. Semarang: IAIN Walisongo Press.
  4. Abdullah, A., & Md. Sham, F. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Religious Counselor Training in ASEAN Countries. Asian Journal of Religion and Society, 12(2), 188–210.
  5. Abdullah, M. (2010). Agama Ramah Lingkungan: Eksplorasi Teologi Lingkungan dalam Al-Qur'an. Jakarta: Paramadina.
  6. Alam, S., & Hassan, M. (2024). Digital Da'wah and Ecotheological Narratives among Muslim Youth in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Communication, 34(3), 301–320.
  7. Ashby, W. R. (1956). An Introduction to Cybernetics. Chapman & Hall.
  8. Aziz, A., & Hasan, N. (2021). Quranic Verses and Environmental Crisis: An Ecological Tafsir Approach. Journal of Quranic Studies, 23(2), 298–325.
  9. Basit, A. (2017). Dakwah Cerdas di Era Modern. Purwokerto: STAIN Press.
  10. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Ballantine Books.
  11. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  12. BPBD Jawa Barat. (2026). Laporan Bencana Hidrometeorologi Cisarua Januari 2026. Bandung: BPBD Jabar.
  13. Chapra, M. U. (2000). The Future of Economics: An Islamic Perspective. Leicester: The Islamic Foundation.
  14. Chapra, U., & Ahmed, R. (2023). Integrating Systemic Thinking into Islamic Environmental Ethics. Journal of Islamic Studies, 34(1), 65–92.
  15. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design (4th ed.). SAGE.
  16. Diwani, T., & Rahman, A. (2022). Freirian Dialogue in Contemporary Islamic Da'wah. Muslim World, 112(2), 155–178.
  17. Farag, L., & Anderson, K. (2023). Interfaith Environmental Collaboration in Southeast Asia: Success Factors and Barriers. Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology, 27(2), 65–89.
  18. Farrukh, M., & Hassan, Z. (2023). Eco-Piety and Pro-Environmental Behavior among Muslim Communities in Asia. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 87, 431–452.
  19. Foltz, R. C. (2003). Islam and Ecology: A Bestowed Trust. Harvard University Press.
  20. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Herder & Herder.
  21. Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action (Vol. 1). Beacon Press.
  22. Hamdan, H., & Yusoff, M. Z. (2023). Comparative Effectiveness of Da'wah Methods in Urban Muslim Communities. Journal of Islamic Studies, 44(2), 205–228.
  23. Hamid, A., & Anwar, M. (2022). Islamic Cosmology and Environmental Behavior: An Empirical Study in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Islam and Society, 9(2), 195–218.
  24. Hassan, N., & Ibrahim, R. (2021). Urban Muslim Expectations of Religious Counselors in Malaysia. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 32(3), 191–212.
  25. Holland, J. H. (1992). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
  26. Idris, M., & Nor, A. M. (2024). Da'wah-Based Environmental Programs in Urban Muslim Communities: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 44(1), 58–79.
  27. Ilaihi, W. (2010). Komunikasi Dakwah. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  28. Johansson, E., & Vinthagen, S. (2020). Religious Framing and Environmental Motivation in Southeast Asia. Ecology and Society, 25(3), 28–47.
  29. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations (2nd ed.). Wiley.
  30. Kementerian Agama RI. (2022). Indeks Kerukunan Umat Beragama 2022. Jakarta: Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kemenag RI.
  31. Kurniasih, D., & Sari, R. (2024). Systems Mapping and Adaptive Capacity of Religious Counselors in West Java. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 18(1), 44–67.
  32. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE.
  33. Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service (30th Anniversary Expanded Ed.). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  34. Maarif, A. S. (2015). Islam dalam Bingkai Keindonesiaan dan Kemanusiaan. Mizan.
  35. Mangunjaya, F. M. (2022). Panduan Ekoteologi Islam untuk Ulama dan Penyuluh Agama. LIPI Press.
  36. Mangunjaya, F. M., & McKay, J. E. (2020). Reviving an Islamic Approach for Environmental Conservation in Indonesia. Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology, 16(3), 80–96.
  37. Masud, M. K. (2021). Islamic Ethics and the Environmental Crisis. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 32(1), 45–62.
  38. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. University of Chicago Press.
  39. Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.
  40. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis (3rd ed.). SAGE.
  41. Moreira, C., & Lopes, R. (2024). Organizational Learning in Islamic Outreach Institutions: A Case Study from Brazil. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 44(1), 67–85.
  42. Mujiburrahman. (2013). Mengindonesiakan Islam: Representasi dan Ideologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  43. Nasr, S. H. (1996). Religion and the Order of Nature. New York: Oxford University Press.
  44. Ozdemir, I. (2022). Islamic Environmental Ethics: Law, Politics, and Praxis. Routledge.
  45. Patel, E., & Giese, C. (2021). Interfaith Environmental Coalitions and Social Cohesion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 60(1), 44–62.
  46. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). SAGE.
  47. Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and Modernity. University of Chicago Press.
  48. Rahmat, E. (2025). Dakwah Struktural PAI dalam Membangun Kerukunan dan Kesadaran Ekoteologis di Bandung Raya [Disertasi]. UIN SGD Bandung.
  49. Rahmat, E. (2025). Dakwah Struktural PAI dalam Membangun Kerukunan dan Kesadaran Ekoteologis di Bandung Raya [Disertasi]. UIN SGD Bandung.
  50. Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday.
  51. Shihab, M. Q. (2011). Wawasan Al-Qur'an. Mizan.
  52. Stacey, R. D. (2003). Complexity and Group Processes. Brunner-Routledge.
  53. Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. SAGE.
  54. Sukayat, T. (2022). Ilmu Dakwah: Perspektif Filsafat Mabadi Asyroh. Bandung: Widya Padjadjaran.
  55. Wan Daud, W. M. N., & Khalil, A. (2020). Islamization of Knowledge and the Urgency of Systemic Integration. Islam and Civilisational Renewal, 11(1), 25–48.
  56. Wan Ibrahim, W. A., & Zulkifli, M. (2023). Contemporary Da'wah Models in the Malay World: Toward an Integrated Framework. Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 61(1), 155–182.
  57. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  58. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press.
  59. Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. New York: Wiley.
Scroll to Top