Integrasi Kepemimpinan Transformasional Dan Profesionalisme Guru Dalam Penguatan Mutu Lulusan Madrasah
Keywords
kepemimpinan transformasional; profesionalisme guru; mutu lulusan madrasah.
Abstract
Era Society 5.0 menuntut madrasah untuk menghasilkan lulusan yang unggul secara akademik, berkarakter Islami, serta memiliki kompetensi abad ke-21, termasuk literasi digital, berpikir kritis, kreativitas, komunikasi, dan kolaborasi. Pencapaian tujuan tersebut memerlukan integrasi antara kepemimpinan transformasional kepala madrasah dan profesionalisme guru sebagai fondasi utama dalam membangun budaya mutu pendidikan. Namun, kajian terdahulu umumnya masih membahas kedua variabel tersebut secara terpisah sehingga belum memberikan gambaran komprehensif mengenai kontribusi integratifnya terhadap penguatan mutu lulusan madrasah pada era Society 5.0. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis hubungan integratif antara kepemimpinan transformasional dan profesionalisme guru dalam memperkuat mutu lulusan madrasah melalui pendekatan studi pustaka. Metode penelitian menggunakan Systematic Literature Review (SLR) dengan mengacu pada pedoman PRISMA 2020. Data diperoleh dari artikel ilmiah bereputasi yang terindeks Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Google Scholar, serta dokumen kebijakan pendidikan nasional dan internasional yang relevan, kemudian dianalisis secara tematik dan komparatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kepemimpinan transformasional berperan dalam membangun visi bersama, memberdayakan guru, mengembangkan budaya kolaboratif, dan mendorong inovasi pembelajaran, sedangkan profesionalisme guru memperkuat kualitas proses pembelajaran melalui peningkatan kompetensi pedagogik, profesional, sosial, kepribadian, serta literasi digital. Integrasi kedua aspek tersebut terbukti berkontribusi terhadap penguatan mutu lulusan madrasah yang adaptif, kompetitif, dan berkarakter. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan pengembangan model kepemimpinan transformasional yang terintegrasi dengan penguatan profesionalisme guru melalui pembelajaran profesional berkelanjutan, transformasi digital, dan sistem penjaminan mutu sebagai strategi peningkatan mutu lulusan madrasah pada era Society 5.0.
References
- Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: Free Press.
- Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving Organizational Effectiveness Through Transformational Leadership. Sage Publications.
- Bellibaş, M. Ş., Kılınç, A. Ç., & Polatcan, M. (2021). Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(5), 776–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X211035079
- Bellibaş, M. Ş., Kılınç, A. Ç., & Polatcan, M. (2021). The Moderation Role of Transformational Leadership in the Effect of Instructional Leadership on Teacher Professional Learning and Instructional Practice. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(5), 776–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X211035079
- Bohari, A., et al. (2024). Transformational Leadership's Role in Shaping Education 4.0. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.4900
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
- Bush, T. (2020). Theories of Educational Leadership and Management (5th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
- Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
- Fukuyama, M. (2018). Society 5.0: Aiming for a New Human-Centered Society. Japan SPOTLIGHT, 27–31.
- Hallinger, P. (2022). Leadership and school improvement: A review of empirical research. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(1), 5–28.
- Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2023). Rencana Strategis Kementerian Agama Tahun 2020–2024. Jakarta: Kementerian Agama RI.
- Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
- Masitoh, S. D., & Purbowati, D. (2024). Enhancing Teacher Professionalism in Indonesia: Challenges and Strategies for Digital Technology Utilization in the Society 5.0 Era. Heutagogia: Journal of Islamic Education, 4(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.14421/hjie.2024.42-06
- OECD. (2023). Reinforcing and Innovating Teacher Professionalism: Learning from TALIS. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/117a675c-en
- Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
- Robinson, V. M. J. (2008). Forging the links between distributed leadership and educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810863299
- Sallis, E. (2015). Total Quality Management in Education (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
- Schleicher, A. (2023). World Class: How to Build a 21st-Century School System (Updated ed.). Paris: OECD Publishing.
- UNESCO. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in Education—A Tool on Whose Terms? Paris: UNESCO.
- Warisno, A., & Hidayah, N. (2022). Investigating Principals' Leadership to Develop Teachers' Professionalism at Madrasah. Al-Tanzim: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v6i2.3570
- World Bank. (2020). Realizing the Future of Learning: From Learning Poverty to Learning for Everyone, Everywhere. Washington, DC: World Bank.